Execution time : polyhedron demo vs full cgal build

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Execution time : polyhedron demo vs full cgal build

Maxime Legraive
This post was updated on .
Hello,

I have downloaded the Polyhedron Demo for Windows as well as the demo dlls
and I have tested some functionalities that it provides.
I have tested the same functionalities with my own code or with the
"examples" codes provided in the CGAL folder. I use CGAL as header-only,
build a .exe and run it via the command prompt.
It seems that the running time is significantly faster on the Polyhedron
Demo than with my own .exe. For instance, I have tested "Isotropic
Remeshing" on the same mesh with the same paremeters, it takes more than a
minute with my own .exe and seems to be done in less than a second with the
demo.

What could be the explanation for this difference ?

Thank you in advance !

Maxime



--
Sent from: http://cgal-discuss.949826.n4.nabble.com/

--
You are currently subscribed to cgal-discuss.
To unsubscribe or access the archives, go to
https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/info/cgal-discuss


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Runnintime : polyhedron demo vs full cgal build

Sebastien Loriot (GeometryFactory)
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Runnintime : polyhedron demo vs full cgal build

Maxime Legraive
Hello Sebastien,

I realize that it was so slow because I was compiling in Debug mode (with
Visual Studio). I have tried in Release mode and it is much faster ! Thank
you.

Maxime



--
Sent from: http://cgal-discuss.949826.n4.nabble.com/

--
You are currently subscribed to cgal-discuss.
To unsubscribe or access the archives, go to
https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/info/cgal-discuss